THE
BHOPAL STRUGGLE
Nineteen years after the world’s worst industrial disaster
in Bhopal, India, survivors and their children are still battling
against an insensitive Government to bring a criminal corporation
to address its pending liabilities. Meanwhile, Union Carbide
– the
company behind a disaster that has killed over 20,000 till
date - is now a wholly owned subsidiary of American transnational
Dow Chemical.
Probably
the longest-standing fight for justice by survivors of an industrial
disaster waged against a transnational corporation, the Bhopal
struggle epitomizes the worst abuses of globalization and the
challenges involved in holding corporations accountable.
However, the survivors’ struggle also points towards the
potential for profound change: justice for Bhopal would set
a towering precedent in international law that no corporate
criminal could ignore. And for this reason, Bhopal is everybody’s
business.
Armageddon Inc
Dow Chemical and Union Carbide merged on February 6 2001, an
unholy wedlock eighteen months in the making. Due to the merger,
Dow inherited Carbide's assets: plants, products, people (many
of whom are still in the same jobs in the same offices), markets
and profits; according to well
established merger law, as the new parent company Dow also
inherited Carbide's liabilities. Long before the merger was
completed, Bhopal
campaigners and Dow’s
own shareholders made it clear to Dow that in taking over
Union Carbide's assets it would also be taking over Carbide's
liabilities in Bhopal, lock stock and all of its stinking barrels.
Dow ignored
the warnings, and misled both its shareholders and the U.S.
Securities Exchange Commission about the true extent of Carbide's
Bhopal-related liabilities. These liabilities include:
•
Criminal Liability
Union Carbide Corporation and its former chairman Warren
Anderson face serious criminal charges, including culpable
homicide, at the Chief Judicial Magistrate’s court in
Bhopal. Neither
party has appeared in court to face trial. Both have been
declared “absconders from justice” (fugitives from
justice) by the Bhopal court.
•
Environmental Liability
Union Carbide fled India leaving behind thousands
of tons of toxic wastes strewn in and around the factory
site. Over the years, these poisons – which include trichloroethene,
1,3,5 trichlorobenzene, dichloromethane, chloroform, lead, and
mercury - have leached
into the groundwater supplying nearly 20,000 people living
nearby. A 2002
study by the Fact Finding Mission on Bhopal found high levels
of many of Carbide’s poisons in the breast milk of mothers
living around the factory.
In
full knowledge of these crimes, Dow, a $30 billion company,
refuses to submit their subsidiary to the Bhopal courts, to
clean up the site, to provide safe drinking water or otherwise
protect the health of people already poisoned once by the gas.
In the almost three years since Carbide became Dow, perhaps
another 1000 survivors have died; also the heavy metals and
volatile organic chemicals emanating from the Carbide factory
have travelled that much further into local aquifers, and from
there into the bodies of thousands of adults and children. Dow
sits back and watches: they are now very much party to the crime
of this progressive poisoning.
Double
Standards
In a recent development which sent its stocks plummeting, Dow
accepted
Carbide’s historical asbestos liabilities in the US,
setting aside as much as $2.2 billion to address future liabilities
arising out of the acquisition. Yet when challenged about its
Bhopal liabilities, Dow speciously maintains that Carbide is
a separate company. That Dow only makes this distinction in
respect of Bhopal reveals deeply racist double standards.
The
Mocking Criminal
In February 2001, survivors' groups began a series of protests
against Dow, calling on the company to accept its legal and
moral responsibilities. In the face of survivors' insistence
that they submit to the rule of law, Dow has responded with
evasion, lies and lawsuits.
Following a peaceful demonstration in Mumbai last December,
the craven Dow slapped
a $10,000 lawsuit upon impoverished survivors. In the suit
Dow claims, without irony, that survivors made
“illegal” demands which included asking for
"compensation for victims of the tragedy, impleadment of
the company in the criminal case and clean up of the site (factory
in Bhopal)."

Click
here
for 20 downloadable posters about Dow-Carbide
Dark
Days Ahead for Dow
Though Carbide had long ago divested itself of its Indian stock
in order to wriggle free of the criminal case in the CJM, Bhopal,
Dow has significant
assets in India that are vulnerable to attachment in the
event of a transfer of pending liabilities from Carbide. If
found guilty in the criminal case, Carbide can be sentenced
to a fine which has no upper limit. Such penalties are decided
based on the magnitude of the crime (in this case, the world’s
worst industrial disaster), the stature and ability of the accused
party to pay (Dow is the world’s largest chemical corporation)
and the current state of the victims. Thus, Dow faces punitive
and restitutionary fines of potentially billions of dollars.
Yet at Dow’s AGM in May 2003, CEO
William Stavropoulos denied to assembled shareholders that
Union Carbide were part of an ongoing criminal case in Bhopal
at all.
It
looks like the lie is soon to blow up in Dow’s face. At
an April 9, 2003 update during the criminal case hearing presented
to the Bhopal court, the prosecuting agency – the Central
Bureau of Investigation (CBI) – said it will submit its
report on including Dow as an accused in the criminal case in
light of Dow’s acquisition of Union Carbide. The same
month survivors and their organisations filed an appeal in the
US Class
Action that aims to hold Dow-Carbide liable for the massive
ongoing contamination around its abandoned factory in Bhopal.
The Madhya
Pradesh government has also stated that it plans to approach
the Indian Supreme Court in a bid to get Dow to clean up the
toxic wastes left behind by its subsidiary Union Carbide.
More
worrying still for Dow, the outstanding issue of Bhopal is being
increasingly seen as central to pressing questions about corporate
crime in a globalized world. This year alone, UK
MP’s signed an Early Day Motion supporting the ICJB,
US Congresspeople
have filed a statement with the Court of Appeals in support
of the US Class Action and called for Dow to accept its Bhopal
liabilities, MP’s
of the European Parliament have joined the call, chemical
worker’s unions, including Dow’s own staff,
have done likewise, and US
students have mobilised against Dow for the first time in
more than 30 years.
A huge
Thank You to everybody who joins us in solidarity, in whichever
way, on the 3rd.