| Workers' victory
against Union Carbide
On June 21st the judge of the Labour Court in Bhopal, Ms.
Seema Shrivastava, ruled in favour of workers sacked by Union Carbide in July 1985
following the closure of the factory. Holding the termination of the employees invalid,
the judge has directed Union Carbide India Limited [renamed Eveready Industries India
Limited] to pay full wages with all service benefits to the workers till such time when
their services are terminated in accordance with the law.
This would amount to about Rs. 1 million ( US $ 23,000) per
worker.The judge has directed the company management to pay the sums due to the workers
within 90 days. As the management prepares to appeal against the judgement, workers are
jubilant with their victory in a 15 year long legal battle.
Termination of Carbide employees illegal: Court
Hindustan Times Correspondent
Bhopal, June 24
LABOUR COURT here has declared the
termination of Union Carbide employees as illegal and as such null and void.
Disposing of six petitions filed by 90 Union
Carbide workers, whose services were terminated along with other employees, of the factory
following gas disaster in 1984, labour court judge Ms Seema Shrivastava said that the
retrenched employees would be entitled to full wages with 91 the service benefits for the
period from the closure of the factory in 1985 to the disposal of the case.
Holding that the employees of Union Carbide
continued to be in service of the company, the judge said that they would continue to be
in job till they were retrenched as per the rules laid down in the Industrial Dispute (ID)
Act.
The judge further observed that the term 'retrenchment' as defined in
Section 2 (00) of the ID Act also embraces within itself the termination of services of
the workmen by the employer for any reason whatsoever than the excepted categories
specified in the Act, even including the act of termination of workmen due to closure of
the undertaking. She held that since the termination of the applicants-employees did not
fall under excepted/excluded categories specified in the Act nor they have been removed by
way of any disciplinary action as such their termination even due to closure of the
factory amounts to illegal retrenchment and as per Section 25 -N (7) of the Act they are
entitled to be declared to be continuing in service.
Ordering the Union Carbide, 'now named Eveready India Ltd. to pay full
wages to the applicants-employees for the intervening period, the court said that the
amount of compensation paid to them at the time of retrenchment could be deducted from the
amount payable to each of the employee.
According to union leader Vijayan K, over 600 retrenched Carbide
employees have convened a meeting at Bal Vihar, tomorrow morning to discuss the situation
in the light of the labour court judgment which has held their retrenchment illegal.
|