Tata FAQ #6: What precedent would be set if Tata were to take responsibility for organizing the clean-up?

Were Tata to take responsibility for organizing the clean-up via voluntary corporate contributions to a designated fund, a precedent would be set whereby the environmental health of a community becomes the responsibility of optional charity work, rather than a legal right to be protected against unsafe practices of multi-national corporations. By allowing liability to be evaded in a disaster of the magnitude of the Bhopal Gas Leak of 1984, a dangerous precedent is set for the future of corporate accountability.
If Dow is allowed to escape liability India, while accepting the analogous liability in America, a precedent will be set for corporations to expand internationally, while avoiding liability should their safety and environmental practices prove to be substandard.

Share this:

Facebooktwitterlinkedinmail

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search the website


Support the Campaign

The International Campaign for Justice in Bhopal is supported by generous tax-exempt donations from individuals like you, and we make the most of every dollar we receive. The Pesticide Action Network-North America (PANNA) is our fiscal sponsor and you can make your tax-deductible donation to the Bhopal Campaign through their secure, online website using credit card, check or PayPal.



Important Links